

The Super Sleuth - February 2010
Investing in Super VS Outside Super
As older taxpayers are preparing for their post-employment years, retirement and savings becomes a focal point to ensure adequate income to extend into their retirement years.
More...
The Top 10 Reasons to Invest in Superannuation
More...
How Much Will You Need to Retire?
As previously mentioned, the current maximum weekly age pension is just $322.10 for single pensioners or $485.60 for a couple.
More...
Henry / Cooper Review Updates
The recently released review into superannuation headed by Jeremy Cooper has several significant recommendations for SMSFs.
More...
SMSF Wills and Estate Planning
When considering Estate Planning for your family, how often do you consider the consequences after you pass?
More...
| How Much Will You Need to Retire? | |
|
As previously mentioned, the current maximum weekly age pension is just $322.10 for single pensioners or $485.60 for a couple. In addition, with life expectancies increasing, people are looking at a longer retirement, further increasing the need for a substantial super balance. As a result, many people will be dependent upon their accumulated superannuation, in order to finance a comfortable retirement. According to the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia, a couple looking to comfortably retire (comfortable defined as the financial ability to participate in a range of recreational activities, purchase household items and take several holidays) will require $51,727 per year, or $995 per week – a figure well above that of the maximum age pension. So how much super is enough? Case Study One Rob is 50 years old, earning $80,000 per annum, with $350,000 in superannuation. Rob wishes to receive $52,000 per annum upon retirement (at age 65). In order to achieve this goal, Rob would need to salary sacrifice an extra $665/ month into superannuation, on top of the current $600/month in SG made by his employer. This would give Rob a superannuation balance of $780,000, allowing him to draw a pension of $52,000 per annum. <see graph 1>
Case Study Two Penny is 33 years old, earning $65,000 per annum, with $100,000 in superannuation. Penny wishes to receive $60,000 per annum upon retirement (at age 60). In order to achieve this goal, Penny would need to salary sacrifice an extra $1,420/ month into superannuation, on top of the current $490/month in SG made by her employer. This would give Penny a superannuation balance of $1,011,000, allowing her to draw a pension of $60,000 per annum. <see graph 2>
N.B. These case studies are for general informational purposes only and are based on several assumptions including taxation rates, life expectancy, inflation rates and rates of return.
|
| Henry / Cooper Review Updates |
|
Henry Review Ken Henry, appointed to review the Australian taxation system, has released his long awaited findings. A few of the Henry Review recommendations were adopted with the May 2010 Budget, with the expectation the government will adopt further recommendations in the near future.
Superannuation Guarantee increase to 12% The Henry Review has recommended a rolling increase to employer Superannuation Guarantee Contribution (SGC) over the next seven years. Starting in 2013 financial year, the SGC will increase from 9.25% to 12% by the 2019 financial year. The delay is designed for business to plan ahead and to factor in these increases in their staff salary packages.
Concessional Contribution Cap The current Concessional Contribution Cap allows contributions up to $50,000 per annum for individuals over 50 years of age, reverting to $25,000 from July 2012, while individuals under 50, only have access to a Concessional Contribution Cap of $25,000. The Henry Review has recommended to allow individuals over 50 years of age, with a superannuation balance under $500,000, the ability to contribute up to $50,000 per annum after July 2012.
Low Income Earners Government Contribution From July 2012, the government will make superannuation contributions on behalf of individuals earning less than $37,000 per annum. The maximum contribution allowable will be $500 per year, which equates to the tax on the employer superannuation guarantee contributions. i.e. $37,000 x 9% = $3,330 x 15% = $500.
Raising Superannuation Guarantee Contribution age to 75 For employees over 70 years, employers are not required to pay superannuation guarantee contributions on their behalf, as they are considered exempt under SGC legislation. This recommendation raises the SGC age limit to 75 years from July 2013 as an incentive for mature aged workers to remain in the workforce.
Taxation Rate of Superannuation Funds The Henry Review has recommended halving the tax rate on earnings for all superannuation funds, including those in accumulation and pension phase. The review recommends decreasing the taxation rate from 15% to 7.5%, including capital gains, while removing the capital gain discounts. At this stage, the government has not adopted this recommendation put forward by the Henry Review. This recommendation would benefit smaller and accumulating balances, while disadvantaging the retirement and transitional population by removing their tax free exemption.
Cooper Review The review into superannuation, headed by Jeremy Cooper, has recently been released, with several significant recommendations for SMSFs.
Borrowing In 2007 the superannuation legislation was amended to allow SMSF trustees to borrow if they met certain requirements. Commonly known as an ‘instalment warrant’, this allowed SMSFs to borrow to purchase assets to be held in trust for the SMSF. The Cooper Review has proposed a ‘wait and see’ approach to these borrowing rules, recommending a review in two years to ensure borrowing does not become a ‘significant focus’ of SMSFs.
SMSFs subject to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal The Cooper Review has recommended the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal (SCT), which is considered a cheaper and quicker tribunal for resolving superannuation related issues, to also allow SMSFs disputes to be heard. Any SMSFs disputes are currently resolved in State Supreme Courts, which can be costly and take time to reach a resolution. With a significant amount of Australians having the bulk of their wealth in SMSFs, this move will allow more disputes resolved in a timely manner, including resolving SMSF death benefits complaints.
In-House Assets An In-House Asset is a loan to or an investment in a related party of an SMSF. The current legislation allows a SMSF to have a maximum of 5% of the total fund balance invested in in-house assets. The Cooper Review is recommending to remove this exemption entirely. Any SMSFs currently with an in-house asset investment will be required to resolve within 10 years.
Collectables (including artworks) Seen as a concern for auditors of SMSF’s in the past, the Cooper Review had initially recommended no new acquisitions and eventual disposal of all collectable assets over the next five years. However the Gillard Government has announced that, if re-elected, they will allow SMSFs to continue investing in collectables including artwork if trustees comply with stringent guidelines. |
| SMSF Wills & Estate Planning |
|
When considering Estate Planning for your family, how often do you consider the consequences after you pass? Do you want all your assets paid to your estate? Or do you own specific assets you wish to pass onto individual beneficiaries? Estate Planning is an area of detail which can assist in ensuring your wishes are followed through after your demise. The process to pass on the assets of your estate begins with your will. Your will is capable of disbursing personal investments to beneficiaries, such as:
People are not as aware that superannuation is classified as a ‘non-estate asset’ in which the deceased cannot pass on their instructions via their will. As more Australians investors are using Self Managed Superannuation Funds as their primary retirement vehicles, estate planning in superannuation funds need to be considered. The distribution of superannuation assets is at the discretion of the superannuation fund trustees. As a member of the superannuation fund you can make an election, based on the trust deed, called a Binding Death Benefit Nomination (BDBN). This form indicates the members’ wishes as to the distribution of their superannuation interests. A Binding Death Benefit Nomination can only be made to a member’s:
A BDBN noted in most trust deeds may be sufficient if passing members’ benefits to their spouse, financially dependant child or to their estate, though they offer limited or no breakup of member components or specific assets. An SMSF Will is a specially tailored Death Benefit Nomination which provides further scope to estate planning strategies. An SMSF Will can distribute certain assets to specific beneficiaries, allocate taxable and tax-free pensions to beneficiaries, and lump sum or pensions for financially dependant beneficiaries. Taxable benefits distributed to a tax dependant (spouse or child under the age of 25) are tax-free. Taxable benefits paid to a non-dependant (such as a child over 25) will incur tax to the dependant at a rate of 16.5% on the taxable component. Tax-free components distributed to dependants and non-dependants will be received in the hands of the beneficiaries tax-free. Therefore, the more tax free component in a members account, the more taxation savings to the beneficiaries of their superannuation interest. We have included some examples to emphasise the value of strategic estate planning. Example 1 Joe, aged 60, is a single member and sole director of Joe Smith Superannuation Fund. Joe has two superannuation interests in his SMSF:
Joe’s wife passed away five years ago and he has two kids, Sally, 24 and Ben, 28. Ben left home several years ago and has started his own family, while Sally still lives with Joe and is considered a financial dependant of Joe. Using an SMSF Will, Joe could stream his superannuation benefits to his two kids equally without any taxation consequences. The taxable pension or lump sum could be paid to Sally, as she is under 25 and as a tax dependant this payment would be tax-free, regardless of the component. The tax-free pension could be passed to Ben. Ben would pay no tax on the benefits as the entire superannuation interest is tax-free.
Example 2 James and his wife Mary are directors of J C Pty Limited, trustee for JC Superannuation Fund. James, 65 and Mary, 55 have been married for 20 years. James has two children from a previous marriage, Jason, 30 and Jess, 28. James’ superannuation interests include:
James wants to ensure both Mary and his kids are taken care of when he passes away. James and Jason are in business together, and their business premises is rented and owned by the JC Superannuation Fund. James wishes to pass on the business premises to Jason on his death. James essentially would like to leave his superannuation benefits to his family as 50% to Mary, 25% to Jess and 25% to Jason. If James had a Binding Death Benefit Nomination in his SMSF, with the above allocation of his superannuation benefits, his beneficiaries would receive the following:
As Mary is a tax dependent of James, she would receive the above benefits tax free.
Jess would be liable for tax on the Taxable Pension benefits at 16.5%, which would result in a tax bill of $41,250.
Jason would be liable for tax on the Taxable Pension benefits at 16.5%, which would result in a tax bill of $41,250. Jason would only receive a cash lump sum from James’ superannuation benefits, as the If James used an SMSF Will, he could request that his superannuation interests be distributed as follows:
The above transactions would mean none of James’ dependants will have to pay tax on their benefits from James’ superannuation interests. Using the SMSF Will also allows James to ensure the Business Real Property is paid to Jason on his passing. |